10 Jun

The Art of Letting Go

Grant Blindbury

Grant Blindbury

Grant Blindbury has been working in the Investment Advisory industry since 2003 managing assets of affluent individuals and pension plans. Grant earned his bachelor's degree in Business & Economics at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) in 2001. Grant specializes in working with clients approaching or entering retirement and positions them for success by coordinating their most important financial affairs. Grant's goal, as his client’s personal CFO, is to deliver both the financial outcome and experience necessary to accomplish their most important goals. In 2007, Grant earned the professional credential CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ (CFP®). He is president of his local Estate Planning Council and participates in multiple professional learning groups. He is on the Board of Directors for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Ventura County as well as being a “Big” himself. From the outset he was drawn to the client-centric model that fee-based advisory services provided and joined forces with Fields Financial Associates, Inc. He would later partner with the founders of Fields Financial Associates to form FMB Wealth Management. He has been a licensed Investment Advisor since 2003.
Grant Blindbury

sometimes come across articles that I feel investors would enjoy, and
last week one of them caught my attention in particular. The author is Jim
Parker, vice president in the Communications group in Sydney, Australia of
Dimensional Fund Advisors, and he talks about the Art of Letting Go. 

By Jim Parker (with permission) 

many areas of life, intense activity and constant monitoring of results
represent the path to success. In investment, that approach gets turned on its

Chinese philosophy of Taoism has a word for it: “wuwei.” It literally means
“non-doing.” In other words, the busier we are with our long-term investments
and the more we tinker, the less likely we are to get good results.

doesn’t mean, by the way, that we should do nothing whatsoever. But it does
mean that the culture of “busyness” and chasing returns promoted by much of the
financial services industry and media can work against our interests.

is one area where constant activity and a sense of control are not well
correlated. Look at the person who is forever monitoring his portfolio, who
fitfully watches business TV, or who sits up at night looking for stock tips on
social media.

Taoism, by contrast, the student is taught to let go of factors over which he
has no control and instead go with the flow. When you plant a tree, you choose
a sunny spot with good soil and water. Apart from regular pruning, you leave
the tree to grow.

it’s not just Chinese philosophy that cautions us against busyness. Financial
science and experience show that our investment efforts are best directed
toward areas where we can make a difference and away from things we can’t

we can’t control movements in the market. We can’t control news. We have no say
over the headlines that threaten to distract us.

each of us can control how much risk we take. We can diversify those risks
across different assets, companies, sectors, and countries. We do have a say in
the fees we pay. We can influence transaction costs. And we can exercise
discipline when our emotional impulses threaten to blow us off-course.

principles are so hard for people to absorb because the perception of
investment promoted through financial media is geared around the short-term, the
recent past, the ephemeral, the narrowly focused and the quick fix.

are told that if we put in more effort on the external factors, that if we pay
closer attention to the day-to-day noise, we will get better results.

more, we are programmed to focus on idiosyncratic risks—like glamor
stocks—instead of systematic risks, such as the degree to which our portfolios
are tilted toward the broad dimensions of risk and return.

we are pushed toward fads that the financial marketing industry decides are
sellable, which require us to constantly tinker with our portfolios.

see, much of the media and financial services industry wants us to be busy
about the wrong things. The emphasis is often on the excitement induced by
constant activity and chasing past returns, rather than on the desired end

consequence of all this busyness, lack of diversification, poor timing
decisions, and narrow focus is that most individual investors earn poor
long-term returns. In fact, they tend to not even earn the returns available to
them from a simple index.

is borne out each year in the analysis of investor behavior by research group
Dalbar. In 20 years, up to 2012, for instance, Dalbar found the average US
mutual fund investor underperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 4 percentage
points a year.1

documented difference between simple index returns and what investors receive
is often due to individual behavior—in being insufficiently diversified, in
chasing returns, in making bad timing decisions, and in trying to “beat” the

one of Australia’s most frequently quoted brokers broke ranks from the industry
and gave the game away on this “busy” investing. In his final note to clients
before retiring to consultancy work, Morgan Stanley strategist Gerard Minack
said he had found over the years that investors were often their worst enemies.2

biggest problem appears to be that—despite all the disclaimers—retail flows
assume that past performance is a good guide to future outcomes,” Minack said.

money tends to flow to investments that have done well, rather than investments
that will do well. The net result is that the actual returns to investors fall
well short not just of benchmark returns, but the returns generated by
professional investors. And that keeps people like me employed.”

a frank admission and one that reinforces the ancient Chinese wisdom: “By
letting it go, it all gets done. The world is won by those who let it go. But
when you try and try, the world is beyond the winning.”


“Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior,” Dalbar, 2013.

Gerard Minack, “Downunder Daily,” Morgan Stanley, May 16, 2013.

Share this